Summary
2008, Vol. 24, No. 10, Pages 2805-2813

Comparison of treatment persistence, hospital utilization and costs among major depressive disorder geriatric patients treated with escitalopram versus other SSRI/SNRI antidepressants

Eric Wua, Paul Greenberga, Elaine Yanga, Andrew Yua, Rym Ben-Hamadia and M. Haim Erderb
Address for correspondence: Eric Wu, PhD, Analysis Group, Inc., 111 Huntington Ave, 10th floor, Boston, MA 02199, USA. Tel.: +16174258254; Fax: +16174258001;



ABSTRACT

Objective: To assess treatment persistence, hospitalization outcomes and mean healthcare costs of geriatric major depressive disorder (MDD) patients treated with escitalopram compared to other selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs).

Research design and methods: Patients aged ≥65 years with at least one inpatient claim or two independent claims associated with MDD diagnosis were identified in the IHCIS National Managed Care Database (2003–2005). Patients were continuously enrolled for at least ≥12 months, filled at least one prescription for an SSRI/SNRI and did not use any second-generation antidepressant during the 6 months pre-index date. Unadjusted and multivariate analyses adjusting for baseline characteristics were conducted.

Main outcome measures: Treatment persistence, hospitalization utilization, and average prescription drug, medical, and total healthcare costs were compared between patients initiated on escitalopram versus other SSRI/SNRIs.

Results: Escitalopram-treated patients (N=459) were less likely to discontinue treatment (HR=0.85, p=0.012) or switch to another second-generation antidepressant (HR=0.76, p=0.006) compared to patients treated with other SSRI/SNRIs (N=1517). Escitalopram-treated patients had 39% fewer hospitalization days (p=0.004). Both groups had similar mean prescription drug costs ($1659 vs. $1630, p=0.687). After controlling for baseline characteristics, escitalopram-treated patients had lower mean total medical service costs ($9425 vs. $12703, p<0.001) and mean total healthcare costs ($11043 vs. $14163, p<0.001).

Limitations: This study's limitations include its small sample size, short observational periods and exclusivity of indirect costs.

Conclusions: Geriatric patients treated with escitalopram had higher treatment persistence, fewer hospitalization days and lower total healthcare costs than patients on other SSRI/SNRIs after controlling for baseline characteristics. Most of the cost savings were due to reductions in hospitalizations.

Full Text | PDF (124 KB) | PDF Plus (125 KB)

Forward Links to Citing Articles

Eric Q. Wu, Paul E. Greenberg, Elaine Yang, Andrew P. Yu, Rym Ben-Hamadi, M. Haim Erder. Treatment persistence, healthcare utilisation and costs in adult patients with major depressive disorder: a comparison between escitalopram and other SSRI/SNRIs. Journal of Medical Economics 0:0, 124-135
Summary | Full Text | PDF (285 KB) | PDF Plus (286 KB) 
(2009) Current awareness in geriatric psychiatry. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry 24:4, i-viii
Online publication date: 1-May-2009.
CrossRef


Users who read this article also read:

Comparison of escitalopram versus citalopram for the treatment of major depressive disorder in a geriatric population
Eric Wu, Paul E. Greenberg, Elaine Yang, Andrew Yu, M. Haim Erder
Current Medical Research and Opinion, Sep 2008, Vol. 24, No. 9, Pages 2587-2595.
Summary | Full Text | PDF (105 KB) | PDF Plus (123 KB) | Add to Favorites | Related 
 

Prev. Article | Next Article
View/Print PDF (124 KB)
View PDF Plus (125 KB)
Add to favourite
Email to a friend
TOC Alert | Citation Alert What is RSS?

 
 
Quick Search
for 
Authors:
Eric Wu
Paul Greenberg
Elaine Yang
Andrew Yu
Rym Ben-Hamadi
M. Haim Erder
Keywords:
Escitalopram
Geriatric
Healthcare costs
Hospitalization
Major depressive disorder
SSRI/SNRI
Treatment persistence