Summary
2008, Vol. 24, No. 2, Pages 441-447

Evaluation of the effects of olopatadine ophthalmic solution, 0.2% on the ocular surface of patients with allergic conjunctivitis and dry eye*

F. S. Maha, T. O’Brienb, T. Kimc and G. Torkildsend,e
Address for correspondence:G. Torkildsen, MD, 863 Turnpike Street, North Andover, MA 01845, USA. Tel.: +1 978 475 0705; Fax: +1 978 475 0008;

*Data from this study were previously presented at the Western Society of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology annual meeting, Jan 14–18, 2007, Wailea, Hawaii

†Pataday is a trade name of Alcon, Fort Worth, Texas, USA



ABSTRACT

Purpose: Olopatadine hydrochloride 0.2% (Pataday, Alcon, Fort Worth, USA) is a topical ocular anti-allergic agent that has shown high rates of efficacy in treating ocular itching, the primary symptom of allergic conjunctivitis, and allows for once-daily dosing. Since some patients suffer from signs or symptoms of dry eye in addition to ocular allergy, this study was designed to evaluate the safety of olopatadine 0.2% in a population of patients with both allergic conjunctivitis and dry eye.

Methods: This was a single-center, 3-visit, double-masked, randomized study. Fifty-two patients diagnosed with ocular allergy and mild-to-moderate dry eye were evaluated. After a run-in period, patients were randomized to receive either olopatadine hydrochloride 0.2% or a tear saline, and self-dosed once-daily for 1 week. Outcome measures included tear film break-up time, corneal and conjunctival staining, tear volume and flow as measured by fluorophotometry, Schirmer's test, injection, and symptom evaluations.

Results: No significant differences between the treatment groups were observed (p > 0.05). No serious adverse events occurred during the trial. Variability in the presentation of dry eye can hinder the observation of treatment effects. Although the study design facilitated the comparison of olopatadine 0.2% against an agent that was certain to not exacerbate dry eye, future comparison of olopatadine 0.2% against other agents in its drug class would provide useful information about relative drug tolerabilities.

Conclusion: As there were no significant changes in the signs and symptoms of dry eye, olopatadine hydrochloride 0.2% is safe to use in ocular allergy patients with mild-to-moderate dry eye.

PDF (234 KB) | PDF Plus (235 KB)

 

Prev. Article | Next Article
View/Print PDF (234 KB)
View PDF Plus (235 KB)
Add to favourite
Email to a friend
TOC Alert | Citation Alert What is RSS?

 
 
Quick Search
for 
Authors:
F. S. Mah
T. O’Brien
T. Kim
G. Torkildsen
Keywords:
Allergic conjunctivitis
Dry eye
Ocular surface disease
Olopatadine